Showing posts with label migration. Show all posts
Showing posts with label migration. Show all posts

Monday, March 30, 2020

Reverse Migration: Why the Long March Home?



The avalanche of migrant workers trying to get out of Delhi 

“It was poverty that forced me to leave my village, and here I am  ... I still have no money,” said Sanjay Choudhary, a construction worker in Nagpur, after he undertook an arduous journey to return back to his native village in Garhwa district in Jharkhand, covering a distance of 400 km. As millions of migrant workers tread home, with small children in tow, walking for hundreds of kms and that too for days together, the story is the same.

The avalanche of migrant workers on a long march home is perhaps the biggest human migration on foot after Independence. As if hit with a sledge hammer – fearing an immediate loss of daily wages, and with employers telling them to vacate the shelters -- millions of migrants’ defied lockdown to head back home. Not only from the major metropolis cities, the reverse migration from across the country has been unprecedented. These hungry and weary millions had first rushed to train and bus stations when the ‘Janata Curfew’ was announced, and when the lockdown was imposed, they were left with little choice but to walk back.

“We know the virus is spreading but we’ll die of starvation if we stay,” echoed a majority of the migrant workers who media talked to. While the TV screens remained filled with images of hungry and exhausted workers walking back, with heart-wrenching stories of how children were carrying the tiny tod on their shoulders, how a 90-year-old woman was walking back and so on, the fact remains that the common thread that ran through the human suffering was how acutely poverty-stricken they were. Everyone walking back had the same distressing tale – they had no money, no work, and no idea how to feed their families. Even those who stayed back are no better. They have been provided with free ration, and charity organisations along with the district administrations are making an effort to provide them cooked food to stay put.   

For the millions of migrant workers life in the urban ghettos in and around industrial and manufacturing units actually hangs by a slender thread. A few days of curfew or a lockdown, the thread is snapped. Living and surviving on daily wages, barely enough to sustain their families, they continue to slog along. “In usually earn around Rs 300 a day picking up bottles, cartons and selling them,” Abdul Halim had told a newspaper.  “What we earn varies from day to day, and from person to person. Ragpickers at best make Rs 300 a day, and a handful of drivers earn better, around Rs 500,” said another ragpicker. Whether they work on a dhaba or a restaurant or work in a small scale industry, the story is almost the same.  

Let’s be very clear. If the underlying objective of economic reforms is to push people, over the past few decades, from the rural areas to the urban centres for the country to attain a higher economic growth, migrant workers are the unsaid victims of development. They have been pushed out of the rural areas, with a majority abandoning farming, aspiring to make a better living. This is what the mainline economists had told us. For instance, a distinguished economist had once said that the big ticket reforms would be when we are able to move farmers out of agriculture to the cities because these cities need cheaper labour or dehari mazdoor. He is not the only mainline economist to have said so, several others – including business and management schools -- have been relentlessly propagating this narrative seeking appropriate policies that aim at moving a large percentage of the population out of rural areas. 

The mass exodus back home has however brought the nation face to face with the stark and grim reality. If after several decades of a policy push, millions of migrant workers surviving on a daily wage have little or no cushion to sustain their livelihood even for a few days if the job is lost, it becomes crystal clear that the trickle-down theory hasn’t worked. While it may be difficult to work out the staggering number of migrant workers who walked back, but the swelling numbers is a clear indicator. Citing the 2011 Indian Census a report in IndiaSpends says that over 60 million migrant labourers work in Mumbai, Delhi, Hyderabad, Kolkata, Chennai and Bengaluru. Since the reverse migration took place from almost every corner of the country, and that includes small urban centres like Panchkula in Haryana, it is important to know that the total number of “internal migrants” form nearly 37 per cent of the population, which means roughly 45.36 crore. Not that they all migrated but quite a staggering percentage of the internal migrants did brave the hardship to return back.

If at a time of an unforeseen crisis the majority of the migrant workers feel comfortable to return home, walking hundreds of kms without food and water, even though knowing that it was the prevailing poverty in villages that first drove them to cities, the lockdown provides a god sent opportunity to policy planners to rethink the flawed policy of keeping agriculture deliberately impoverished so as to keep the economic reforms viable. If agriculture could be turned economically viable, I am sure a majority of the migrant work force that walked back would not be keen to return. The small land-holdings, despite the fragmentation that is taking place, serve as an economic security for small and marginal farmers. Even if everything else doesn’t work, the small patch of land holdings would sustain the farm families.

It is therefore time to redesign the economic policies that have continuously driven people out of agriculture to join the marginal force of dehari mazdoors in the cities. Right kind of policy mix can bring back the pride in farming, and restore the dignity of farmers, enabling them to stay back in villages. Instead of pulling a rickshaw in the cities, and holed in dingy rooms packed with half a dozen more people, the villages are socially-inclusive and gives them a sense of belonging. In other words, the long march to the villages has left behind a strong lesson -- reviving agriculture is the key to reboot the economy. #

Why the long march home? Deccan Herald. Mar 31, 2020


READ MORE - Reverse Migration: Why the Long March Home?

Sunday, April 14, 2019

Nearly 50% country reeling under drought but fails to top election agenda

Pic courtesy: DW Blogs
WHEN The Tribune reported on March 1 that nearly 47% of the country was in the grip of a severe drought, with at least 16 % falling in the category of ‘extreme’ or ‘exceptional’, and knowing that drought could further worsen farm distress, lead to increased migration from rural to urban areas, I thought the misery being encountered by roughly 500 million people or 40% of the population would shift the focus, even in an election year, to provide immediate relief measures. 
My belief that the dominant narrative would change, with each party trying to outdo what the other promised, and perhaps move its cadre to the rural hinterland, providing a helping hand to the drought-affected, too, remained wishful thinking. To make it still worse, Skymet Weather Services, a private agency, has forecast a deficient monsoon ahead, and the Indian Meteorological Department has shown that the country has received 36% less rainfall between March 1 and March 28 compared with the long-term average. Another report by IndiaSpend points to Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Telangana, Bihar, Jharkhand, parts of Northeast, Gujarat, Maharashtra and Rajasthan being the worst hit. ‘In 31 reservoirs in the southern states, water availability stands at 25% of total capacity, which has gone down by 36 percentage points over five months from 61% of the capacity in November 2018.’ There is more trouble ahead.

In another well documented report, IndiaSpendconveys the agony and plight of the drought hit Rayalaseema region of Andhra Pradesh, comprising four districts of Anantapur, Kurnool, Chitoor and YSR Kadapa. Accordingly, the region has faced 15 droughts in the 18 year period between 2000 and 2018. Quoting the district administration, the report says the region continues to face nine consecutive years of drought. This year again, the drought continues. An estimated 700,000 people have moved out in 2018 looking for menial labour to survive. Villages after villages are empty with only the elders and small children left behind by some couples who migrated. This year, there is hardly a crop field which doesn’t look barren and abandoned.  

Even in the drought-affected areas in Maharashtra, where the continuing agrarian crisis is expected to cast its impression in the ensuing elections, news reports point to how the ruling party is trying to instead build up an election campaign based on muscular nationalism but very quietly bypassing the central issue of farm distress gripping the seven districts of the region. Opposition parties are however focusing on the neglect of the farm sector over the years and how agrarian distress has worsened. So much so, seeing that the real issues gripping the region are being swept under the carpet, a farm widow Vaishali Yede has decided to take the battle to the ballot. She is contesting from Yavatmal-Washim constituency in eastern Maharashtra, a farm suicide prone region. Her simple message is: mahyavar laksh asudya ji” (keep me in your prayers and thoughts), ostensibly telling people to remember the plight of farmers when they go out to vote.

In Telangana too, there are 170 farmers contesting against K Kavitha, daughter of Chief Minister K Chandrasekhar Rao, who is standing from Nizamabad Lok Sabha constituency. Reports also say that 111 Tamil Nadu farmers, who had earlier campaigned at New Delhi, will be contesting against the Prime Minister Narendra Modi from Varanasi Lok Sabha constituency. While the intent in both the cases seems to be rather symbolic in nature, but it does however signify the anger and frustration sweeping the countryside.

At a time when farm incomes have plummeted to its lowest in the past 15 years, and the real rural wage growth has seen a steep fall – from 11.8 per cent growth in 2013-15 to 0.45 per cent in 2016-18, the National Sample Survey Office (NSSO) estimates 3.2-crore casual rural workers losing their job between 2011-12 and 2017-18. Of these, 3-crore labourers were working on the farm. But yet, after the news has been reported in the newspapers, and after a few news analyses published, the dominant narrative again shifts back. Agricultural crisis that took so long to emerge at the centrestage of the political debate has once again been relegated to the background. “The effort to bring emotions (nationalism) in the elections will lead to all other issues going under the carpet. The farmers will continue to die,” says farmer leader Vijay Jawandhia from Maharashtra, visibly displeased.

One reason why people in the cities do not feel concerned, and that is why the prominent discourse remains impervious of the pain and suffering being felt in the rural areas is because of a development inequality woven through the process of economic growth. To illustrate, why only water shortage, the problems that crippling drought would normally bring are rarely felt in the cities. Simply because all efforts have been to build the cities, turning them drought proof over the years. All efforts have gone to ensure that the urban population do not have to suffer the consequences of a drought. The rivers flowing in rural areas can go dry, the soil becoming parched, crops withering but the development design ensures regular tap water supply in the cities or for at least a few hours during the day. While cities have 24 hours power supply, ask a farmer for how many hours does he get electricity? I have seen farmers waking up early, going to the fields to water the standing crops.

A few hours away from Mumbai, life comes to a standstill. Go to Bangalore, and it is rare that you can even get a distant feeling of a severe drought that prevails just a few kilometres outside the metropolis. It is this kind of insinuation that keeps the urban population largely disconnected with its rural hinterland. Why only blame the urban centric media, which hardly has any roots in the mofussil towns what to talk of villages, even the academia and bureaucracy remains oblivious. When the urban elite as well as middleclass is least interested, it is futile to expect the politicians alone to fill in the gap. Unless each one of us, irrespective of our political ideology, thinks of a farmer when talking of elections or when you go to vote I don’t think farming will ever swing political decision making. But as the Prime Minister said the other day in a newspaper interview thinking of a farmer too is nationalism. #  

Toiling to be heard. The Tribune.April 13, 2019.
READ MORE - Nearly 50% country reeling under drought but fails to top election agenda