Showing posts with label health. Show all posts
Showing posts with label health. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 13, 2020

Will Lack of Social Distancing Or Threats To Touch Someone Be Suspendable and Expellable Offenses When Students Return To School?

By Michelle Ball, California Education Attorney for Students since 1995


Schools and students are in turmoil in California, with all pushed to distance education for fear of  the "invisible enemy" aka Coronavirus.  But what about the upcoming fall and the 2020-21 schoolyear?  How will students return to school in the Coronavirus "new normal" and how will school restrictions be enforced?  Imagine kids prior normal actions at school (running, hanging out, talking, high-fiving, texting, laughing, playing sports together, walking through crowded hallways) and now imagine those actions 6 feet apart.  How will schools stop kids from interacting and how will they be punished if they do not socially distance?  I am not looking forward to finding out.

It is hard to imagine kids playing on a playground and social distancing, isn't it?  Let's take a 5, 10 or even a 16 year old and try to keep them 6 feet away from their friends.  How will this work?  What about in physical education (PE)?  Will they just jog alone or play tennis?  There are innumerable questions and serious concerns on how this will be managed.  It is not hard to envision a heavy type of authoritarianism will exist in schools to enforce the new standards.  In this new "normal" what will schools do to stop kids who run within 6 feet of someone or who shake someone's hand?  Will they be suspended, or even expelled for placing someone in theorized danger?  I hope not, but I am not sure.

California students will have to navigate severe restrictions and face a new class of offenses that at this time can only be imagined, such as:

-  Being within 6 feet of another.
-  Not sanitizing properly
-  Threatening others with touching, spitting or breathing on them
-  Lying that they have Coronavirus to intimidate and scare others
-  Threatening to bring Coronavirus to school
-  Touching a friend, teacher or staff member (e.g. high-fiving, hugging, poking, bumping into someone)
-  Touching things around campus
-  Not sanitizing their desk or seat, etc. when they change classes
-  Playing in groups
-  Playing contact sports
-  Using someone else's stuff
-  Going to the bathroom when someone else is using it
-  Sitting in the wrong seat, spot or being in a place not marked with a taped "X" 
-  Not wearing a mask (if required)
-  Whispering to each other
-  Coughing or sneezing and not covering up the cough/sneeze
-  Coming to school with a fever or sick
-  Not reporting when a family member is sick
-  Posting on social media related to Coronavirus in a way that threatens students or creates a school disruption

There are no direct provisions in the California Education Code for suspension or expulsion for failure to social distance, or for students not waiting their turn, YET, but there are provisions in the Education Code for suspension or expulsion for other things that I fear may be used against kids.  

Education Code §48900:

This code section allows suspension or expulsion for many things, including threatening someone, disruption/defiance, and bullying:

A pupil shall not be suspended from school or recommended for expulsion, unless the superintendent of the school district or the principal of the school in which the pupil is enrolled determines that the pupil has committed an act as defined pursuant to any of subdivisions (a) to (r), inclusive:

(a)(1) Caused, attempted to cause, or threatened to cause physical injury to another person...

(k) Disrupted school activities or otherwise willfully defied the valid authority of supervisors, teachers, administrators, school officials, or other school personnel engaged in the performance of their duties. [expulsion and suspension may be limited depending on grade level]...

(r) Engaged in an act of bullying. For purposes of this subdivision, the following terms have the following meanings:
(1) “Bullying” means any severe or pervasive physical or verbal act or conduct, including communications made in writing or by means of an electronic act, and including one or more acts committed by a pupil or group of pupils as defined in Section 48900.2, 48900.3, or 48900.4, directed toward one or more pupils that has or can be reasonably predicted to have the effect of one or more of the following:
(A) Placing a reasonable pupil or pupils in fear of harm to that pupil’s or those pupils’ person or property.
(B) Causing a reasonable pupil to experience a substantially detrimental effect on the pupil’s physical or mental health.
(C) Causing a reasonable pupil to experience substantial interference with the pupil’s academic performance.
(D) Causing a reasonable pupil to experience substantial interference with the pupil’s ability to participate in or benefit from the services, activities, or privileges provided by a school.

So, if a student threatens another student with coming close to a friend and "getting" them, will this mean they are threatening them with harm?  What if a student purposefully intimidates a student who is very fearful of Coronavirus?  Will this be bullying?  If a student refuses to stand apart from friends trying to play, will they be sent to the office?  What if they want to run around separately, but accidentally run into each other- will they be expelled for endangering someone?  Is this even far-fetched in the current climate of California?  Not necessarily.  This is just one more minefield they will have to navigate.

Another code section which could conceivably be twisted into a tool to punish during the Coronavirus panic is Education Code §48900.4, which states:

...a pupil enrolled in any of grades 4 to 12, inclusive, may be suspended from school or recommended for expulsion if the superintendent or the principal of the school in which the pupil is enrolled determines that the pupil has intentionally engaged in harassment, threats, or intimidation, directed against school district personnel or pupils, that is sufficiently severe or pervasive to have the actual and reasonably expected effect of materially disrupting classwork, creating substantial disorder, and invading the rights of either school personnel or pupils by creating an intimidating or hostile educational environment.

The student who threatens another daily with touching them, with being next to them on the bus, with breathing on them, could conceivably have this code thrown at them to punish.

What about Education §48900.7?  This section allows suspension or expulsion for making threats of grave harm which can be immediately carried out:

(a) ... a pupil may be suspended from school or recommended for expulsion if the superintendent or the principal of the school in which the pupil is enrolled determines that the pupil has made terroristic threats against school officials or school property, or both.
(b) For the purposes of this section, “terroristic threat” shall include any statement, whether written or oral, by a person who willfully threatens to commit a crime which will result in death, great bodily injury to another person, or property damage in excess of one thousand dollars ($1,000), with the specific intent that the statement is to be taken as a threat, even if there is no intent of actually carrying it out, which, on its face and under the circumstances in which it is made, is so unequivocal, unconditional, immediate, and specific as to convey to the person threatened, a gravity of purpose and an immediate prospect of execution of the threat, and thereby causes that person reasonably to be in sustained fear for his or her own safety or for his or her immediate family’s safety, or for the protection of school district property, or the personal property of the person threatened or his or her immediate family

One can only imagine a student saying he spit on his hands and rubbed all the doors and handles, or who did not wash his hands (or gloves if required) before he came to class, or who tells many people he has Coronavirus and will purposefully make the school sick (despite not having it), being accused of terroristic threats. 

As I frequently see kids unfairly suspended and expelled, this is just one more concern I have when kids return to school under California's strict Coronavirus control measures.  Ultimately, it will be up to the reasoned application of discipline rules to students by school administrators and the strong advocacy of parents.  Let's hope schools use their discretion to discipline wisely in the "new normal."  We shall see.

Best,

Michelle Ball
Education Law Attorney 

LAW OFFICE OF MICHELLE BALL 
717 K Street, Suite 228 
Sacramento, CA 95814 
Phone: 916-444-9064 
Email:help@edlaw4students.com 
Fax: 916-444-1209

Please see my disclaimer on the bottom of my blog page. This is legal information, not legal advice and no attorney-client relationship is formed by this posting, etc. etc.!  This blog may not be reproduced without permission from the author and proper attribution of authorship.

READ MORE - Will Lack of Social Distancing Or Threats To Touch Someone Be Suspendable and Expellable Offenses When Students Return To School?

Monday, July 25, 2016

Mandatory Vaccinations For School: Who Will Be Excluded And Parental Options

By Michelle Ball, California Education Attorney for Students since 1995

Most California public school students must be fully vaccinated to attend public or private classroom-based schools.  If a student is not vaccinated, or does not fit within an exemption, they will be excluded from school until proof of vaccination is submitted.  As a majority of children are vaccinated already, most parents will yawn and send their kids to school.  However, what will happen if a student missed even one shot?  Are there any options if a parent does not want to vaccinate their child for the student to attend regular school?  

The list of required vaccinations is outlined in California Health and Safety Code section 120325 and 120335 and includes slightly different requirements if a student is entering classroom-based school in seventh grade or will start under the new law in transitional kindergarten through sixth grade.  The vaccinations required if a student enters prior to seventh grade are:

     (1) Diphtheria.
     (2) Hepatitis B.
     (3) Haemophilus influenzae type b.
     (4) Measles.
     (5) Mumps.
     (6) Pertussis (whooping cough).
     (7) Poliomyelitis (polio)
     (8) Rubella.
     (9) Tetanus.
     (10) Varicella (chicken pox).

If a student is unvaccinated when they start seventh grade, they do not have to receive the Hepatitis B vaccination.  A presumption may be made that if a student enters beyond seventh grade, this also applies, but the law does not address this.

If a parent missed one of the required vaccinations, or failed to complete all required vaccination administrations (e.g.missed one of the shots in a series), the student may be excluded from school until the vaccination is completed.  The student also may be allowed to continue attending so long as they seek vaccinations within a certain time period (unspecified).

If a parent does not obtain the vaccination within any offered time period, or is not vaccinated promptly, and the parent does not transfer their child to a non-classroom based school or program, it is possible the student will be subject to not only continued exclusion, but ironically, potential truancy breach allegations (breach of mandatory compulsory education laws requiring full time attendance for ages of 6-18 with student being potentially labelled truant after 3 missed days).  As such, any student excluded will be in a bit of a time crunch and will need to act quickly.

There are a few ways around the legal requirement that a child be vaccinated to attend school:

1)  EXEMPTION AND WITHIN GRADE SPAN:  If a parent submitted exemption paperwork prior to January 1, 2016, their child may continue attending the current "grade span" unvaccinated.  Grade spans outlined in the law are from birth to preschool, transitional kindergarten to sixth grade, and seventh through twelfth grade (see CA Health & Safety section 120335(g)).  This means a student entering eighth grade in the fall of 2016 unvaccinated, with a personal belief exemption on file prior to January 1, 2016, may attend through high school.  However, a student entering seventh grade in the fall of 2016 unvaccinated with a personal belief exemption on file is out of luck and must be fully vaccinated.

2)  MEDICAL EXCUSE:  If parents provides a physician's opinion that their child cannot be vaccinated for medical reasons the student may attend unvaccinated (see CA H & S 120370).

3)  SPECIAL EDUCATION:  If a student is a special education student, the law states it "does not prohibit" them from receiving their special education and related services.  The California Department of Health has clarified in their Frequently Asked Questions page, stating:  "Students who have an individualized education program (IEP) should continue to receive all necessary services identified in their IEP regardless of their vaccination status."  There remains some grey area here, and the matter will only be clarified over time and/or by a court or state agency.

4)  ATTENDANCE AT EXEMPT SCHOOL:  Students may also avoid vaccination requirements by attending home-based private schools or public independent study programs with no classroom-based instruction.  An example of this could be seen in an independent study charter or private school where a student remains home for instruction from their parent.  Independent study via a traditional public school may also meet this requirement, so long as no classroom-based instruction is part of the program.

A lawsuit has been filed attempting to reverse the vaccination law based on the right to an education (see for example, Goss v. Lopez 419 U.S. 565).  However, as of right now, the California mandatory vaccination laws, some of the most restrictive in the United States, remain in effect.

The drama and confusion which will unfold in this process will be difficult for some parents.  Hopefully not too many students will be left in the dark or kicked out of their school while it all shakes out.

Best,
Michelle Ball
Education Law Attorney 

LAW OFFICE OF MICHELLE BALL 
717 K Street, Suite 228 
Sacramento, CA 95814 
Phone: 916-444-9064 
Email:help@edlaw4students.com 
Fax: 916-444-1209
[please like my office on Facebook, subscribe via twitter and email, and check out my videos on Youtube!]


Please see my disclaimer on the bottom of my blog page. This is legal information, not legal advice and no attorney-client relationship is formed by this posting, etc. etc.!  This blog may not be reproduced without permission from the author and proper attribution of authorship.
READ MORE - Mandatory Vaccinations For School: Who Will Be Excluded And Parental Options

Monday, July 8, 2013

May A Student Carry Sunscreen And Sun-Protection Items On A School Campus?

By Michelle Ball, California Education Attorney for Students since 1995

With the raging hot sun in California, sun exposure is a serious concern for many parents. Consequences from sunburns can be painful and potentially dangerous. Can public schools deny students the ability to carry sunscreen or other sun-protection gear on campus?  Generally, no.

The need for youth to be protected is so important that the California legislature took the time to write and pass a law which gives students the right to carry sunscreen and to wear sun-protective clothing on school campuses.  

Per California Education Code section 35183.5:

(a) (1) Each schoolsite shall allow for outdoor use during the schoolday, articles of sun-protective clothing, including, but not limited to, hats.
   (2) Each schoolsite may set a policy related to the type of sun-protective clothing, including, but not limited to, hats, that pupils will be allowed to use outdoors pursuant to paragraph (1).  Specific clothing and hats determined by the school district or schoolsite to be gang-related or inappropriate apparel may be prohibited by the dress code policy.
   (b) (1) Each schoolsite shall allow pupils the use of sunscreen during the schoolday without a physician's note or prescription.
   (2) Each schoolsite may set a policy related to the use of sunscreen by pupils during the schoolday.
   (3) For purposes of this subdivision, sunscreen is not an over-the-counter medication.
   (4) Nothing in this subdivision requires school personnel to assist pupils in applying sunscreen.

As can be seen, limitations may be applied to sun-blocking apparel which may be "gang-related" or "inappropriate," but a student cannot be stopped from wearing a hat to block the sun which does not breach other school policies.  Students also cannot be forced to leave their sunscreen in the office or at home.  And, no adult or other school personnel needs to be involved in the application or administration of sunscreen.

So, during long hot days or otherwise when the sun is out, if your school states that your child may only leave their sunscreen in the office, can't carry it, or that the teacher needs to give out or apply the sunscreen, don't buy it.  Instead, cite the above code to uphold your child's sun-protection rights!

Best,
Michelle Ball
Education Law Attorney
LAW OFFICE OF MICHELLE BALL
717 K Street, Suite 228
Sacramento, CA 95814
Phone: 916-444-9064
Fax: 916-444-1209
Email: help@edlaw4students.com


[please like my office on Facebook, subscribe via twitter and email, and check out my videos on Youtube!]

Please see my disclaimer on the bottom of my blog page. This is legal information, not legal advice and no attorney-client relationship is formed by this posting, etc. etc.!  This blog may not be reproduced without permission from the author and proper attribution of authorship.


READ MORE - May A Student Carry Sunscreen And Sun-Protection Items On A School Campus?